Last night we reported that Microsoft has filed a legal action against Samsung in U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. The reason was that Samsung has stopped paying patent royalties as per the contract it signed in 2011 citing lame reasons like Microsoft acquired Nokia’s Devices and Services business. David Howard, Corporate Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Microsoft said, “After spending months trying to resolve our disagreement, Samsung has made clear in a series of letters and discussions that we have a fundamental disagreement as to the meaning of our contract.” Microsoft’s complaint to the court is now available online. You can read it below. Here is the summary of the document, Samsung signed patent cross licensing agreement with Microsoft and agreed to pay royalties to Microsoft for its Android based products. Samsung is now refusing to pay this year’s royalty along with the interest for ...

Read More →

Yesterday, we reported that a federal judge in the US ruled Thursday that Microsoft must hand over e-mails stored on an overseas server to US authorities. Following a two-hour court hearing in New York, U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska said the warrant lawfully required the company to hand over any data it controlled, regardless of where it was stored. We already know that companies like AT&T, Verizon, Apple, Cisco and others filed their support for Microsoft’s argument in the court. Today Verizon and AT&T responded to court’s initial verdict, Verizon’s statement, “We respectfully disagree with the judge’s opinion for the reasons stated in our General Counsel’s prior blogs (here, and here) and in our amicus brief (PDF). We support Microsoft’s challenge to the decision. “These matters are very fact-sensitive, and while we have not received a request like this one before, if we were to receive a warrant from the United States ...

Read More →

Microsoft seized 22 domain names from dynamic DNS provider No-IP as those domains were being abused in malware-related crimes against Windows users. With a special order from federal court, Microsoft became the domain IP resolver for the No-IP domains. In this process, millions of innocent users got affected due to domain issues that happened due to Microsoft’s actions. No-IP provided the following statement regarding this, We have been in contact with Microsoft today. They claim that their intent is to only filter out the known bad hostnames in each seized domain, while continuing to allow the good hostnames to resolve. However, this is not happening. Apparently, the Microsoft infrastructure is not able to handle the billions of queries from our customers. Millions of innocent users are experiencing outages to their services because of Microsoft’s attempt to remediate hostnames associated with a few bad actors. Had Microsoft contacted us, we could ...

Read More →

Israel basedd software company MiniFrame Ltd. sued Microsoft in New York, claiming that Microsoft used its monopoly in the operating systems market to pressure potential clients not to buy MiniFrame’s PC-sharing software. MiniFrame’s PC-sharing software allows multiple users to access the same computer operating system from multiple locations, using only a monitor, keyboard and mouse, which the company said did not violate the terms of Microsoft’s original use licensing agreements. Those licenses only barred multiple computers from accessing the same Windows system, according to MiniFrame. But in 2007, recognizing the competitive threat that such software introduced, Microsoft added new terms to its licensing deals that restricted the use of its operating systems to a single user, MiniFrame’s complaint alleges. There was no technological reason behind this change, according to MiniFrame. “Microsoft’s ability to maintain its monopoly in the server operating system market against the competing PC-sharing software (e.g., MiniFrame’s SoftXpand product) is ...

Read More →