The Backstory Behind the Halo Movie That Was Never Made

15

Film site “One View With A Room” has a nice series on best films never made.  Among them was the Halo movie which would have been co-produced by Peter Jackson, of Lord of the Rings/Hobbit fame, and directed by Neill Blomkmap best known for District 9.  The script was written by Alex Garland most recently known for the highly successful Dredd 3D film.   What ultimately killed the project was Microsoft’s inexperience in the movie business coupled with a greedy and controlling movie studios Fox and Universal.  Here is an excerpt:

In amongst the dusty annals of the best films never made, one blockbuster lies atop the pile. Widely known and anticipated for the last 8 years, the ultimate videogame film/adaptation, and the one film that could never make the final jump to our cinema screens: Halo. So what if one of the biggest videogame franchise had made it to the big screen? What if Alex Garland’s (Dredd/Sunshine scribe) script had been accepted by all? What if money was no object? What if the two industries could just get along?

Microsoft had it all figured out. Hollywood studios would fall over themselves to write blank cheques for their Golden Child. They were right, to an extent. Halo had bags of potential both commercially and creatively. By 2005, the year of the first attempt to adapt, the Bungie Studios game had sold 13 million units grossing a tremendous $600 million dollars. With a fan base of millions, a deep and well-layered storyline (depending on your P.O.V), as well as hundreds of potentially kick ass action/shoot-em-up scenes, it’s understandable why Microsoft were feeling confident when entering the film market for the first time.

Microsoft meant business, and wanted lucrative business in return. Their first move: pay scriptwriter Alex Garland an impressive $1 million to write a draft script. However, Garland did not have free reign to create his own project. Microsoft supervised the entire process. Although it is tough to truly judge their influence, in a recent interview with IGN for the promo tour of Dredd, he discussed his Halo script. He admits from the outset,

“On something like Halo, I’m a writer for hire. They have a thing they want to do. I’m not bringing anything to the party as it were. They are saying “we would like you to do this” and I’m trying to do it as well as I can.”

The leaked script of Garland’s 2005 script further hints they made their presence felt. The script follows the plot of the game strongly. It’s a balls-to-the-wall violent sci-fi war movie. It’s ruthless. Irrelevant of whether you like the story of Halo or not, it reads like the videogame adaptation you dreamed of.

So, with a script in hand, Microsoft were ready to win Tinseltown over. On 6 June 2005 they attempted one of the boldest, bravest and potentially best pitches in cinema history. One of Hollywood’s leading agency, CAA, had been brought in to ensure that everything went off without a hitch. Larry Shapiro, leading the deal on behalf of CAA, and his team beamed with creativity as they aimed to unite the two industries through a little of the ol’ razzle and dazzle.

At the strike of midday, 6 actors adorned in green, blue and red Spartan armour onto the studio lots of all major studios. Fox, Dreamworks, Paramount, Universal, Fox – all of them invaded. The actors’ instructions were to deliver two items, whilst sworn to remain silent throughout: one script and one term sheet. That terms sheet, according to Variety, showed Microsoft’s demands of $10 million upfront against 15% of the box office gross.

As Shapiro notes, “No property, not even Harry Potter, was getting [what we were asking for]”.

Notably Miramax, owned by Harvey Weinstein at this point, was ignored as they were considered to be uninterested in the project and, more intriguingly, they were not big enough. Weinstein would cry outrage for years at his snub, but Microsoft would not budge. Their movie had to be the greatest. It deserved to be.

The executives were given less than 6 hours to read the script and make their decision whether they were in or out. Immediately, most studios passed. The razzmatazz was all well and good, but Halo was a worldwide brand and studios knew what they were letting themselves in for. Microsoft’s bold, almost arrogant, demands for a first time adaptation deterred many with the script delivery fanfare nothing more than a gimmick. Their down payment of $1 million dollars to Garland was all Microsoft were willing to pay towards production, their collaborative studio would have to foot the bill. On top of this, they insisted upon a representative being flown into the editing suite for every cut of the movie during post-production, as well as creative approval over the cast and crew, plus over 50 VIP tickets for Microsoft personnel to attend the premiere and set.

Nevertheless, by the end of play, Fox and Universal remained. This is where the differences between the two industries became wholly apparent. Microsoft, according to Jamie Russell, had a ‘one adaption, one studio’ mindset, yet Hollywood doesn’t work that way. It’s about lunches and late night soirees. It’s about smooth talking and handshake. To translate, Fox and Universal didn’t just enter a bidding frenzy – Fox simply rang Universal to ask their thoughts on the deal, which resulted in the pair agreeing to join forces. As Russell notes, Fox would take foreign and Universal would take U.S. domestic – “Microsoft’s bargaining position had been pole-axed”. However, Microsoft would still get $5 million, and 10% of the grosses. As my nan says, better than a poke in the eye with a sharp wooden stick.

Once the deal was struck, Peter Jackson’s name entered the fray after coming off the back of the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Jackson decided upon a co-producer role instead promoting the talents of his protégé Neill Blomkamp. Blomkamp adored the Halo universe: “I was genetically created to direct Halo…I know that my version of Halo would have been insanely cool. It was more fresh and potentially could have made more than just a generic, boring film.” Blomkamp’s directorial flair and passion for the genre was obvious as shown in his promotional work entitled Halo 3: Landfall for the release of the third game. Released after this full feature project fell into development hell, these shorts are far from perfect. Rough around the edges and lacking the depth of other shorts I’ve seen, it still has enough energy and enthusiasm to engage and enthuse over the prospect of a Halo movie. Interesting to note as the shorts go on, the quality increase.

However, as Indiewire points out, Fox & Microsoft were never Blomkamp’s bosom buddies. Fox disagreed with the director’s intense, POV, lo-fi visuals as well as misunderstanding his youthful intellectual style. Blomkamp’s Nike commercials and short film Alive in Joburg – that would later expanded into District 9 – had all made the South African director a talent to watch, but all the studios were never convinced, especially Fox. Blomkamp notes

 “The way Fox dealt with me was not cool…I’ll never ever work with Fox ever again because of what happened to Halo – unless they pay me some ungodly amount of money and I have absolute fucking control.”

 Not close at all then.  Universal, easily the more positive of the pairing, funded $12 million of initial development. The majority of these resources were spent on hiring writers such as Josh Olson, D. B. Weiss and Scott Frank to edit and tinker. Alongside this, they funded Jackson to use his beloved Weta Workshop to create real life versions of Halo’s weapons, soldiers and vehicles. Despite these developments, progress was slow. Fox and Universal weren’t getting the shoot-em-up space blast-a-thon they had in mind.

Relationships were so fraught that in October 2006 when Universal asked for a reduction in the producers’ deals and they refused, Halo was stopped dead in its tracks. Shapiro, Jackson and Blomkamp have all gone on record to say that money and control were the two major reasons the project died.

On the press tour for District 9, Blomkamp spoke stated he would not direct Halo if offered the job.

“I worked on it for five months…I put a lot of sweat and blood into Halo…but when you work that long on something and you have it bottom out and collapse…I mean, I got District 9 out of it, I think I’m probably better off because it’s more of a personal film. I love the world of Halo. I don’t think I would go back there.

As of 2009, the rights have reverted back to Microsoft. Since then, Halo 3 and 4 have been released to worldwide success and Steven Spielberg hovered around the project in 2008/9 – but no activity has been generated into turning this franchise into a film epic.

Peter Jackson, Neil Blomkamp, and Alex Garland all went on to do bigger and better things after the Halo project disaster.  In fact Blomkamp’s work on the Halo movie led him direct the critically acclaimed film ‘District 9.’

Read: Leaked Halo Script

Review: Halo Script

Source: One Room With A View

H/T: Long Zheng

Just as a side note I saw Neil Blomkamp’s Elysium over the holidays starring Mat Damon.  It’s a terrible movie, please avoid it, it primarily pushes a political message.  The other movies mentioned above, The Hobbit movies, Lord of the Rings trilogy, District 9, and Dredd 3D are all awesome, please watch them.

I curious as to which actress would have been casted as Cortana.  I think Jessica Chastain (of Zero Dark Thirty fame) would have worked quite well, who would you want? Megan Fox wouldn’t have been bad either, the possibilities are endless… Share your thoughts in the comments below

cortana Jessica-Chastain1Megan-Fox-hermosa

 



About Author

Suril is a scientist, journalist and obsessive Microsoft observer. He holds an advanced degree in Biotechnology with minors in Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Molecular Biology. Send him tips on twitter: http://www.twitter.com/surilamin

  • FateStayNight

    Sasha grey wouldn’t be bad either and she wouldn’t have issues with a little thing like nudity ;)

    • Davey

      Yes… I can see her face would work well. Though she’d require some, ahem, digital augmentation.

      • http://twitter.com/surilamin surilamin

        Thats a good point, we would need an actress with a decent set of +2s. Rebecca Romijn who played Mystique in the X-men series would work well here too.

  • Guilty Spark

    Actually Elysium is pretty good movie, especially about the way in sends and integrates messages, which are relevant and painful even today. Put onto that the Blomkamp’s vision of the anti-utopian future.. and .. you i know, i liked it

  • Pingback: The Backstory Behind the Halo Movie That Was Never Made | WMPoweruser()

  • Mikado_Wu

    Have to agree Elysium was unbearable, I walked out and snuck in Frozen. Frozen was awesome.

    Why does Cortana need to be an actress, CGI her and continue to use Jen as the Voice.

    • http://twitter.com/surilamin surilamin

      I think economics is going to come into play here. A fully CGIed Cortana may be too expensive or technically difficult to do. They even needed an actor for Gollum in LOTR. Also a sexy actress would be good for marketing the movie.

      But you do bring up another good point. The actress chosen needs to have a sexy voice and one that can emulate the Cortana in the games.

      • Davey

        No!! Jen Taylor’s voiceover, or the whole thing won’t work.

      • Wayne Sebbens

        It’s true that Andy Circus was on set as Gollum in LotR and The Hobbit, but he was usually in a green-screen suit so that the other actors knew where to look (and the CGI artists knew where and how to place him). He did motion capture stuff too so that Gollum moved around realistically, as well as the voice. But Gollum is still CGI. The same can be done easily with Cortana (moreso because she’s more humanly shaped than Gollum was)

      • kalval

        Gollum was originally to be 100% animated CGI, but upon seeing how good the physical performance of the voice actor (Andy Serkis) was, Peter Jackson elected to use motion capture for a lot of the Gollum scenes. The visuals are still 100% CGI.

  • Bugbog

    You do Elysium a disservice! Yes it’s message was quite muddled and it ended up losing it’s way (so if you had watched District 9 you’d be disappointed), but as a basic shoot ‘em up I’d give it a ‘B’

  • http://yourig.livejournal.com/ ZloiYuri

    Peter Jackson, Neil Blomkamp and Alex Garland? Oh, thanx God this movie they never maid… Trilogy about crowd of permanently self-reflexing but damn pretty cool creatures leaving behind the ruins… NO!

  • Azjerei

    Hobbit was awful, don’t watch it :P

    • Nham Thien Duong

      It’s an awesome film based on a great book.

  • Nham Thien Duong

    Thank you for writing this great article :-)